Jun. 13th, 2018

timelets: (Default)
Let's say, there are a lot of people in the market who are willing to buy bullshit. Does it produce a negative externality? E.g., does this willingness to buy BS affect prices for the real stuff? Or does it just impose search costs on all consumers, so that brands benefit from perceived quality, i.e. reduced search costs?
timelets: (Default)
Let's say, two parties signed a vague letter of intent. There's no deal yet but they have expressed a certain desire to come up with a deal in the future. Maybe. Later. Nevertheless, one of the parties claims that the deal (remember, there's no deal yet) makes a huge difference for the entire world. The statement is speculative at best, fraud at worst. If it were a business, one could gamble on the news, by buying cheap out of money LEAPS. Instead, half of the country is willing to buy this crappy stock at full price. Amazing.



upd: I think Tillerson got fired in part because as a responsible manager he wouldn't do this kind of PR shit.

Profile

timelets: (Default)
timelets

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  1234 5
678 9 101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 11:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »