It's for "Banks Not Among the 100 Largest in Size", and even that is still 5.85%, so nowhere close to 50%+. Major banks see lower delinquency rates.
This also includes delinquencies up to 180 days past due. Normally no transactions are authorized beyond 60 DPD, so only maybe a third of that is relevant to our discussion. The other two thirds have been rolling through the delinquency buckets towards the default way before government shutdown started.
Also this number includes all credit card customers, employed and unemployed. Unemployment is the most powerful predictor of credit risk, hence delinquency rate among employed government workers should be lower than average.
Re: He's not wrong
Date: 2019-01-25 12:48 am (UTC)Re: He's not wrong
Date: 2019-01-25 12:58 am (UTC)Re: He's not wrong
Date: 2019-01-25 01:05 am (UTC)I see 2.74% instead.
Re: He's not wrong
Date: 2019-01-25 01:25 am (UTC)Here's a better source. Marginal delinquencies tend to go up in Q1 and they've been already trending up lately.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/DRCCLOBS
Re: He's not wrong
Date: 2019-01-25 02:37 am (UTC)This also includes delinquencies up to 180 days past due. Normally no transactions are authorized beyond 60 DPD, so only maybe a third of that is relevant to our discussion. The other two thirds have been rolling through the delinquency buckets towards the default way before government shutdown started.
Also this number includes all credit card customers, employed and unemployed. Unemployment is the most powerful predictor of credit risk, hence delinquency rate among employed government workers should be lower than average.
Re: He's not wrong
Date: 2019-01-25 02:51 am (UTC)